rfc.dk

Cited in: RFC 9942

14 RFCs mentioned in the text of RFC 9942 (CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE) Receipts)

RFCTitleStatusDate
2119Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement LevelsS. BradnerBest Current PracticeMarch 1997
7120Early IANA Allocation of Standards Track Code PointsM. CottonBest Current PracticeJanuary 2014
7841RFC Streams, Headers, and BoilerplatesJ. Halpern, Ed., L. Daigle, Ed., O. Kolkman, Ed.InformationalMay 2016
8126Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCsM. Cotton, B. Leiba, T. NartenBest Current PracticeJune 2017
8174Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key WordsB. LeibaBest Current PracticeMay 2017
8392CBOR Web Token (CWT)M. Jones, E. Wahlstroem, S. Erdtman, H. TschofenigProposed StandardMay 2018
8610Concise Data Definition Language (CDDL): A Notational Convention to Express Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) and JSON Data StructuresH. Birkholz, C. Vigano, C. BormannProposed StandardJune 2019
8949Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)C. Bormann, P. HoffmanInternet StandardDecember 2020
9052CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE): Structures and ProcessJ. SchaadInternet StandardAugust 2022
9053CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE): Initial AlgorithmsJ. SchaadInformationalAugust 2022
9162Certificate Transparency Version 2.0B. Laurie, E. Messeri, R. StradlingExperimentalDecember 2021
9338CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE): CountersignaturesJ. SchaadInternet StandardDecember 2022
9596CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE) "typ" (type) Header ParameterM.B. Jones, O. SteeleProposed StandardJune 2024
9597CBOR Web Token (CWT) Claims in COSE HeadersT. Looker, M.B. JonesProposed StandardJune 2024