rfc.dk

Cited in: RFC 9613

13 RFCs mentioned in the text of RFC 9613 (Requirements for Solutions that Support MPLS Network Actions (MNAs))

RFCTitleStatusDate
2119Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement LevelsS. BradnerBest Current PracticeMarch 1997
3031Multiprotocol Label Switching ArchitectureE. Rosen, A. Viswanathan, R. CallonProposed StandardJanuary 2001
3032MPLS Label Stack EncodingE. Rosen, D. Tappan, G. Fedorkow, Y. Rekhter, D. Farinacci, T. Li, A. ContaProposed StandardJanuary 2001
3552Guidelines for Writing RFC Text on Security ConsiderationsE. Rescorla, B. KorverBest Current PracticeJuly 2003
5331MPLS Upstream Label Assignment and Context-Specific Label SpaceR. Aggarwal, Y. Rekhter, E. RosenProposed StandardAugust 2008
5586MPLS Generic Associated ChannelM. Bocci, Ed., M. Vigoureux, Ed., S. Bryant, Ed.Proposed StandardJune 2009
5920Security Framework for MPLS and GMPLS NetworksL. Fang, Ed.InformationalJuly 2010
6790The Use of Entropy Labels in MPLS ForwardingK. Kompella, J. Drake, S. Amante, W. Henderickx, L. YongProposed StandardNovember 2012
6973Privacy Considerations for Internet ProtocolsA. Cooper, H. Tschofenig, B. Aboba, J. Peterson, J. Morris, M. Hansen, R. SmithInformationalJuly 2013
7841RFC Streams, Headers, and BoilerplatesJ. Halpern, Ed., L. Daigle, Ed., O. Kolkman, Ed.InformationalMay 2016
8126Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCsM. Cotton, B. Leiba, T. NartenBest Current PracticeJune 2017
8174Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key WordsB. LeibaBest Current PracticeMay 2017
9088Signaling Entropy Label Capability and Entropy Readable Label Depth Using IS-ISX. Xu, S. Kini, P. Psenak, C. Filsfils, S. Litkowski, M. BocciProposed StandardAugust 2021