rfc.dk

Cited in: RFC 9503

9 RFCs mentioned in the text of RFC 9503 (Simple Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (STAMP) Extensions for Segment Routing Networks)

RFCTitleStatusDate
2119Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement LevelsS. BradnerBest Current PracticeMarch 1997
7841RFC Streams, Headers, and BoilerplatesJ. Halpern, Ed., L. Daigle, Ed., O. Kolkman, Ed.InformationalMay 2016
8126Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCsM. Cotton, B. Leiba, T. NartenBest Current PracticeJune 2017
8174Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key WordsB. LeibaBest Current PracticeMay 2017
8402Segment Routing ArchitectureC. Filsfils, Ed., S. Previdi, Ed., L. Ginsberg, B. Decraene, S. Litkowski, R. ShakirProposed StandardJuly 2018
8545Well-Known Port Assignments for the One-Way Active Measurement Protocol (OWAMP) and the Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (TWAMP)A. Morton, Ed., G. Mirsky, Ed.Proposed StandardMarch 2019
8762Simple Two-Way Active Measurement ProtocolG. Mirsky, G. Jun, H. Nydell, R. FooteProposed StandardMarch 2020
8972Simple Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol Optional ExtensionsG. Mirsky, X. Min, H. Nydell, R. Foote, A. Masputra, E. RuffiniProposed StandardJanuary 2021
9256Segment Routing Policy ArchitectureC. Filsfils, K. Talaulikar, Ed., D. Voyer, A. Bogdanov, P. MattesProposed StandardJuly 2022