rfc.dk

Cited in: RFC 9270

11 RFCs mentioned in the text of RFC 9270 (GMPLS Signaling Extensions for Shared Mesh Protection)

RFCTitleStatusDate
2119Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement LevelsS. BradnerBest Current PracticeMarch 1997
3209RSVP-TE: Extensions to RSVP for LSP TunnelsD. Awduche, L. Berger, D. Gan, T. Li, V. Srinivasan, G. SwallowProposed StandardDecember 2001
3473Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Signaling Resource ReserVation Protocol-Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) ExtensionsL. Berger, Ed.Proposed StandardFebruary 2003
4426Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Recovery Functional SpecificationJ. Lang, Ed., B. Rajagopalan, Ed., D. Papadimitriou, Ed.Proposed StandardMarch 2006
4872RSVP-TE Extensions in Support of End-to-End Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) RecoveryJ.P. Lang, Ed., Y. Rekhter, Ed., D. Papadimitriou, Ed.Proposed StandardMay 2007
4873GMPLS Segment RecoveryL. Berger, I. Bryskin, D. Papadimitriou, A. FarrelProposed StandardMay 2007
6372MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) Survivability FrameworkN. Sprecher, Ed., A. Farrel, Ed.InformationalSeptember 2011
7412Requirements for MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) Shared Mesh ProtectionY. Weingarten, S. Aldrin, P. Pan, J. Ryoo, G. MirskyInformationalDecember 2014
7841RFC Streams, Headers, and BoilerplatesJ. Halpern, Ed., L. Daigle, Ed., O. Kolkman, Ed.InformationalMay 2016
8174Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key WordsB. LeibaBest Current PracticeMay 2017
8776Common YANG Data Types for Traffic EngineeringT. Saad, R. Gandhi, X. Liu, V. Beeram, I. BryskinProposed StandardJune 2020