rfc.dk

Cited in: RFC 8256

8 RFCs mentioned in the text of RFC 8256 (Requirements for Hitless MPLS Path Segment Monitoring)

RFCTitleStatusDate
2119Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement LevelsS. BradnerBest Current PracticeMarch 1997
3031Multiprotocol Label Switching ArchitectureE. Rosen, A. Viswanathan, R. CallonProposed StandardJanuary 2001
5860Requirements for Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) in MPLS Transport NetworksM. Vigoureux, Ed., D. Ward, Ed., M. Betts, Ed.Proposed StandardMay 2010
5921A Framework for MPLS in Transport NetworksM. Bocci, Ed., S. Bryant, Ed., D. Frost, Ed., L. Levrau, L. BergerInformationalJuly 2010
6371Operations, Administration, and Maintenance Framework for MPLS-Based Transport NetworksI. Busi, Ed., D. Allan, Ed.InformationalSeptember 2011
6372MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) Survivability FrameworkN. Sprecher, Ed., A. Farrel, Ed.InformationalSeptember 2011
7841RFC Streams, Headers, and BoilerplatesJ. Halpern, Ed., L. Daigle, Ed., O. Kolkman, Ed.InformationalMay 2016
8174Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key WordsB. LeibaBest Current PracticeMay 2017