rfc.dk

Cited in: RFC 10070

15 RFCs mentioned in the text of RFC 10070 (Updates to OAuth 2.0 JSON Web Token (JWT) Client Authentication and Assertion-Based Authorization Grants)

RFCTitleStatusDate
2046Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) Part Two: Media TypesN. Freed, N. BorensteinDraft StandardNovember 1996
2119Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement LevelsS. BradnerBest Current PracticeMarch 1997
3986Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic SyntaxT. Berners-Lee, R. Fielding, L. MasinterInternet StandardJanuary 2005
4648The Base16, Base32, and Base64 Data EncodingsS. JosefssonProposed StandardOctober 2006
6749The OAuth 2.0 Authorization FrameworkD. Hardt, Ed.Proposed StandardOctober 2012
6838Media Type Specifications and Registration ProceduresN. Freed, J. Klensin, T. HansenBest Current PracticeJanuary 2013
7519JSON Web Token (JWT)M. Jones, J. Bradley, N. SakimuraProposed StandardMay 2015
7521Assertion Framework for OAuth 2.0 Client Authentication and Authorization GrantsB. Campbell, C. Mortimore, M. Jones, Y. GolandProposed StandardMay 2015
7522Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) 2.0 Profile for OAuth 2.0 Client Authentication and Authorization GrantsB. Campbell, C. Mortimore, M. JonesProposed StandardMay 2015
7523JSON Web Token (JWT) Profile for OAuth 2.0 Client Authentication and Authorization GrantsM. Jones, B. Campbell, C. MortimoreProposed StandardMay 2015
7841RFC Streams, Headers, and BoilerplatesJ. Halpern, Ed., L. Daigle, Ed., O. Kolkman, Ed.InformationalMay 2016
8174Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key WordsB. LeibaBest Current PracticeMay 2017
8414OAuth 2.0 Authorization Server MetadataM. Jones, N. Sakimura, J. BradleyProposed StandardJune 2018
8725JSON Web Token Best Current PracticesY. Sheffer, D. Hardt, M. JonesBest Current PracticeFebruary 2020
9126OAuth 2.0 Pushed Authorization RequestsT. Lodderstedt, B. Campbell, N. Sakimura, D. Tonge, F. SkokanProposed StandardSeptember 2021